AERO
QTR_03.11
GO!
download Download This Article (PDF - 2.7 MB)
Safe, Efficient Flight Operations in Regions of Volcanic Activity
Safe, Efficient Flight Operations in Regions of Volcanic Activity

Volcanoes continue to erupt around the world, from Iceland to Ecuador and from Chile to Africa, causing disruption to air travel. Airspace monitoring and flight operational procedures have been put in place and commercial jet aviation has been operating safely in areas with volcanic eruptions. Boeing’s recommendation is to avoid areas of visible ash. However, if a flight crew inadvertently encounters volcanic ash, there are steps that they can take to safely exit the ash cloud. Additional efforts are being made to improve the efficiency of air traffic in the event of a volcanic eruption.

By Douglas Kihm, Technical Fellow, Airworthiness and Extended Operations,
and Darren Macer, Lead Engineer, Boeing Commercial Airplanes Operations Center

In regions with volcanic activity, airline operations can be safely conducted by following fundamental guidelines.

Since the significant Eyjafjallajökull volcanic event of 2010, the aviation industry has developed additional guidance for safe, efficient flight operations in the event of a volcanic eruption. The International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) International Volcanic Ash Task Force (IVATF) is leading this effort. The industry is accumulating and reviewing the world’s best practices for addressing airspace control during a volcanic eruption and developing recommendations that accommodate all global situations. Boeing provides significant support to this effort.

This article details ongoing work to improve the efficiency of air traffic in the event of a volcanic eruption, provides information about operating in the vicinity of a volcanic ash cloud, explains how to detect the presence of a volcanic ash cloud, and offers practical information for flight crew operations and maintenance inspections if a volcanic ash cloud is encountered.

Monitoring and responding to volcanic ash events

Although some information about volcanic eruptions had been available at the time of eruptions in the 1980s and 1990s, the aviation industry recognized that it was insufficient. The industry then collaborated with the volcanological and meteorological communities in a joint effort to find ways to avoid future volcanic ash encounters.

ICAO has laid much of the foundation for volcanic ash monitoring through its Volcanic Ash Warnings Study Group. ICAO also formed the International Airways Volcano Watch Operations Group in 1987. These groups formalized the international arrangements for monitoring and providing warnings to the aviation community about volcanic ash in the atmosphere.

ICAO’s Annex 3 Meteorological Service for International Air Navigation and the World Meteorological Organization’s Technical Regulation C.3.1 introduced standards to disseminate information about volcanic ash to the aviation community in the form of Significant Meteorological Information (SIGMET) and Notices to Airmen (NOTAM).

One of the results of these efforts was the establishment of today’s Volcanic Ash Advisory Centers (VAACs). VAACs provide an important link among volcano observatories, meteorological agencies, air-traffic control centers, pilots, and operators. Currently, nine VAACs continuously monitor and report on a particular region of the world (see fig. 1).

Figure 1: Volcanic Ash Advisory Centers

There are nine Volcanic Ash Advisory Centers (VAACs) located around the world. Each VAAC focuses on a specific geographical region.

Figure 1

ICAO has also published the Handbook on the International Airways Volcanic Watch (Document 9766). It defines responsibility and operational procedures for distributing information on volcanic eruptions and associated ash clouds that could affect routes used by international flights.

Improving operational efficiency during volcanic ash events

Commercial jet aviation has been operating safely and efficiently for many years since the hazards associated with operations in volcanic ash have been identified and airspace and flight operational procedures have been established. This successful history has been based on avoiding operations in a visible ash cloud or one discernable by satellite imagery, ground observers, flight crew, and pilot reports, augmented by forecasting model predictions and SIGMETs as required.

In most of the world, flight operations in the event of a volcanic eruption have been based on information provided by the VAAC to airlines about the location and forecasted movement of the visible ash cloud. The calculated ash concentration values produced by trajectory/dispersal models are strongly dependent on the input values of the models — including the total amount, composition, height of the plume, and particle size of ash being ejected from the volcano. Input values are difficult to estimate, which leads to inaccuracies in the forecasted concentration charts. These inaccuracies can vary from one eruption to another, even from the same volcano. As a result, trajectory/dispersal model forecasts need to be correlated with other observations. For the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull event, the areas where high ash concentration was forecasted appear to correlate roughly to areas of visible ash as seen from satellite images.

In the aftermath of the Eyjafjallajökull eruption, ICAO’s European and North Atlantic (EUR/NAT) Office revised the existing EUR/NAT volcanic ash contingency plan. A key enhancement was the decision to control airspace as is done by other airspace control authorities: After an initial eruption, the volcanic ash cloud is treated like a meteorological event and advisory and SIGMET information is provided to operators to allow them to determine how best to avoid operations in the volcanic ash cloud (see fig. 2). This approach proved successful in other areas of the world.

Figure 2: 2009 Mt. Redoubt Volcanic Ash Advisory

This Volcanic Ash Advisory graphic from the 2009 Mt. Redoubt eruption was created using satellite imagery, ground observers, flight crew, pilot reports (PIREPs), and forecasting models.

Figure 2
VOLCANIC ASH ADVISORY
DTG: 20090326/2040
VAAC: ANCHORAGE
AREA: SOUTH CENTRAL ALASKA
SUMMIT ELEV: 10198FT (3109m)
ADVISORY NUM: 2009–18
INFO SOURCE: POES/GOES/AVO/PILOT REPORT/RADAR
ERUPTION DETAILS: EXPLOSIVE ERUPTION AT 26/1724 UTC
REMARKS: LIGHT ASHFALL REPORTED AT HOMER BY TRUSTED OBSERVER.
NEXT ADVISORY: 20090327/0240Z

ICAO’s IVATF is currently working to consolidate successful practices from around the world to provide enhanced volcanic ash contingency procedures and improve the accuracy and consistency of the VAAC advisories.

Boeing supports efforts to continue to understand the susceptibility of airplanes and jet engines to volcanic ash clouds. Because of the unique characteristics of each volcanic eruption and the ensuing ash cloud, it is not practical to define a single ash concentration threshold for airplanes or jet engines. Boeing continues to recommend avoiding visible ash and is also working with the aviation community through the ICAO IVATF to refine and enhance ICAO’s volcanic ash regional contingency plans.

Airline Flight Planning to avoid volcanic ash

Airline flight planning staffs and flight crews should be aware of potential volcano eruptions near their routes. One way is through aviation color-code notifications (see fig. 3). These notifications are used to provide succinct information about volcanic ash hazards to the aviation industry. The color codes are in accordance with recommended ICAO procedures to help pilots, dispatchers, and air traffic controllers who are planning or executing flights over broad regions of the globe quickly ascertain the status of numerous volcanoes. They can use this information to determine whether continued attention, flight rerouting, cancellation, diversion, or extra fuel is warranted.

Figure 3: Aviation color-code notifications

Aviation color-code notifications provide concise information about potential volcanic ash hazards. Airline flight planners can use this information to route flights away from potential ash clouds.

Figure 3
Green Alert     Yellow Alert     Orange Alert     Red Alert

Volcano is in normal, non-eruptive state.

Or, after a change from a higher alert level:

Volcanic activity considered to have ceased and volcano returned to its normal, non-eruptive state.

Volcano is experiencing signs of elevated unrest above known background levels.

Or, after a change from higher alert level:

Volcanic activity has decreased significantly but continues to be closely monitored for possible renewed increase.

Volcano is exhibiting heightened unrest with increased likelihood of eruption.

Or:

Volcanic eruption is under way with no or minor ash emission (specify ash-plume height if possible).

Eruption is forecasted to be imminent with significant emission of ash into the atmosphere likely.

Or:

Eruption is under way with significant emission of ash into the atmosphere (specify ash-plume height if possible).

 
Note: The color code for the level of alert indicating the status of activity of the volcano and any change from a previous status of activity should be provided to the area control center by the responsible volcanological agency in the state concerned (e.g., “Red alert following yellow” or “Green alert following orange”).
Detecting the presence of a volcanic ash cloud

Despite all precautions and planning, it is still possible to encounter an ash cloud. Boeing provides training and instructions for flight crews to use when there is an indication that an airplane has entered an ash cloud, which can be found via the Web portal MyBoeingFleet.com. Discernable indicators that an airplane is penetrating volcanic ash can include odor, haze, changing engine conditions, air speed, pressurization, and static discharges.

Odor. When encountering a volcanic ash cloud, flight crews usually notice a smoky or acrid odor that can smell like electrical smoke, burned dust, or sulfur.

Haze. Most flight crews, as well as cabin crew or passengers, see a haze develop within the airplane. Dust can settle on surfaces.

Changing engine conditions. Surging, torching from the tail pipe, and flameouts can occur. Engine temperatures can change unexpectedly, and a white glow can appear at the engine inlet.

Air speed. If volcanic ash fouls the pitot tubes and static ports, the indicated air speed can decrease or fluctuate erratically, with associated effects on airplane systems.

Pressurization. Cabin pressure can change, including possible loss of cabin pressurization.

Static discharges. An electrostatic phenomenon similar to Saint Elmo’s fire or glow can occur. In these instances, blue-colored sparks can appear to flow up the outside of the windshield or a white glow can appear at the leading edges of the wings or at the front of the engine inlets.

Recommendations for flight crew if a volcanic ash cloud is encountered

If an airplane does encounter a volcanic ash cloud, Boeing provides flight crew procedures for dealing with the situation. The following are general recommendations (each operator’s flight operations manuals include more specific instructions):

Following these procedures will ensure the highest possible level of flight safety. Although this information has been available for several years, flight crews need to continue to be vigilant of the signs of volcanic ash and to be familiar with the proper procedures to prevent serious incidents.

Recommendations for maintenance crews if a volcanic ash contamination is reported or suspected

Following a volcanic ash encounter, or suspected encounter, a volcanic ash conditional inspection should be performed as detailed in the Aircraft Maintenance Manual, Chapter 05 (see fig. 4). As a result of the 2010 Eyjafjallajökull event, based on operator feedback Boeing has restructured the inspections to a phased approach. Whereas the previous inspections required extensive and time-consuming inspections after reported operation in an environment that contained volcanic ash, the new approach allows the inspections to cease if no signs of damage or ash exist at certain points in the phased inspections. The initial phase is designed to be conducted at a remote location without the need of specialized tools, thus ensuring that an airplane can quickly be returned to service if no evidence of ash is detected. Only if evidence of ash is found is the operator required to continue to the next phase, each becoming more involved proportionately to the potential damage due to the encounter.

Figure 4: Volcanic ash conditional inspection

This illustration shows airframe and systems areas of particular interest for operations in areas contaminated with volcanic ash.

Figure 4
Summary

Boeing believes that operations in regions with volcanic activity can be conducted safely by avoiding visible ash. A volcanic ash event should be treated like a meteorological event, such as a severe weather condition. Operators should be provided advisory information regarding the location of an ash cloud to use in determining the most appropriate action to take, such as rerouting flights, diverting flights to alternate airports, or cancelling flights. If flight crews unexpectedly encounter an ash cloud, they should take appropriate action.

For more information, contact Doug Kihm.

Back to top | Continue to next article